Overview

Dual-Use Technology Companies in NATO DIANA

Dual-use technology has both civilian and defence applications: a sensing platform sold to port operators, an energy system built for remote industry, a quantum device developed for research instruments. DIANA is built around that overlap, funding commercial deep-tech companies whose products can also serve Alliance security needs. This hub reads the tracked portfolio through that lens, grouping 274 distinct companies into 12 technology themes.

12
Technology themes
Stable groupings across cohorts
274
Distinct companies
30
Countries represented
Energy and power
Largest theme
42 tracked companies

What dual-use means here

Commercial first

Most DIANA companies are commercial deep-tech businesses with civilian customers. The programme funds adaptation toward defence and security use rather than building defence-only products from scratch.

Challenge-led

Each round publishes challenge areas that describe an Alliance need. A company enters the portfolio by matching its existing technology to one of those needs.

Tested, not just funded

Alongside grant funding, companies get access to the DIANA test centre network so dual-use claims can be trialled in a realistic environment.

Dual-use themes by size

Tracked NATO DIANA company records per technology theme. Companies can appear in more than one theme.
Technology themeCompaniesShareRelative size
Energy and power4213.2%
Artificial intelligence3912.3%
Cyber and information security3310.4%
Communications and electromagnetic309.5%
Sensing and surveillance299.1%
Critical infrastructure and logistics299.1%
Human performance and biotechnology288.8%
Data and decision superiority257.9%
Quantum185.7%
Space154.7%
Maritime operations154.7%
Autonomy and uncrewed systems144.4%

Space

Companies selected under the Resilient Space Operations challenge area.

15 companies · 7 countries

Energy and power

Companies selected under the Energy Resilience (2024) and Energy & Power (2025, 2026) challenge areas.

42 companies · 15 countries

Sensing and surveillance

Companies selected under the Sensing & Surveillance challenge area (2024, 2025).

29 companies · 13 countries

Cyber and information security

Companies selected under the Secure Information Sharing (2024) and Data & Information Security (2025) challenge areas.

33 companies · 19 countries

Data and decision superiority

Companies selected under the Data Assisted Decision Making challenge (2026) and the Decision Superiority for NATO Warfighters special challenge.

25 companies · 12 countries

Maritime operations

Companies selected under the Maritime Operations challenge area (2026).

15 companies · 8 countries

Communications and electromagnetic

Companies selected under the Advanced Communication Technologies and Contested Electromagnetic Environments challenge areas (2026).

30 companies · 16 countries

Human performance and biotechnology

Companies selected under the Human Health & Performance (2025) and Human Resilience & Biotechnology (2026) challenge areas.

28 companies · 8 countries

Quantum

Companies whose public descriptions reference quantum technology. There is no dedicated quantum challenge area; this theme is derived from company descriptions.

18 companies · 9 countries

Artificial intelligence

Companies whose public descriptions reference AI or machine learning. AI appears across many challenge areas; this theme is derived from company descriptions.

39 companies · 17 countries

Where dual-use companies are based

Twelve largest countries by tracked NATO DIANA company records.
CountryCompaniesShareRelative size
United Kingdom4721.2%
United States4520.3%
Canada3716.7%
France146.3%
Italy135.9%
Germany135.9%
Netherlands115%
Norway115%
Sweden104.5%
Poland83.6%
Spain73.2%
Finland62.7%
See the full country breakdown and map

All tracked companies

Showing 1-25 of 275 company records. Filters are not indexed and do not change this page's address.

Technology themeRecord status
52 North HealthUnited Kingdom2025Human Health & PerformanceVerified against official source
Aboa Space Research OyFinland2026Human Resilience & BiotechnologyPublicly reported
AdamantQSweden2026Contested Electromagnetic EnvironmentsVerified against official source
AdaptronicsItaly2026Resilient Space OperationsVerified against official source
Aedil ASNorway2025Critical Infrastructure & LogisticsVerified against official source
AegisXSweden2026Autonomy & Unmanned SystemsVerified against official source
AereusGermany2026Data Assisted Decision MakingVerified against official source
Aerix SystemsFrance2026Autonomy & Unmanned SystemsVerified against official source
AI GPR LtdUnited Kingdom2025Sensing & SurveillanceVerified against official source
AI VerseFrance2025Sensing & SurveillanceVerified against official source
Airloom EnergyUnited States2026Energy & PowerVerified against official source
AKHEROS SASFrance2025Data & Information SecurityVerified against official source
AktiverUnited States2026Data Assisted Decision MakingPublicly reported
Alba OrbitalUnited Kingdom2026Resilient Space OperationsVerified against official source
AlchemyCanada2026Operations in Extreme Environments
Verified against official source
Alea Quantum TechnologiesDenmark2025Data & Information SecurityVerified against official source
ALIAS ROBOTICS, S.L.Spain2026Autonomy & Unmanned SystemsPublicly reported
Alpha AutonomyGreece2026Autonomy & Unmanned SystemsVerified against official source
AmorphiQUnited Kingdom2026Contested Electromagnetic EnvironmentsVerified against official source
AMPHITRITEFrance2026Maritime OperationsVerified against official source
Anzen Technology SystemsUnited Kingdom2024Secure Information SharingVerified against official source
Applied AtomicsUnited Kingdom2026Resilient Space OperationsPublicly reported
APR Technologies ABSweden2025Energy & PowerVerified against official source
Aquark TechnologiesUnited Kingdom2024Sensing & SurveillanceVerified against official source
ArcaniUnited Kingdom2026Autonomy & Unmanned SystemsVerified against official source

Related pages

Methodology and limitations

Dual-use is the programme's own framing rather than a per-company label: DIANA selects for technologies with civilian and defence applications, so every tracked company is presented in that context. Themes are derived either from the official challenge area a company was selected under or, where DIANA has no matching challenge area, from the company's own published description.

The tracker does not assess how far along the defence-application path any individual company is, and it holds no export-control classification. Nothing here should be read as a dual-use control determination.

Alliance Tech Tracker is independent and unofficial and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NATO or DIANA. Where a value is not published, records show "Not publicly available" rather than an estimate. See the full methodology.

Sources

Dataset version 2026.08 · data as of August 2026 · last reviewed 2026-08-23 · explore or download the full dataset